3 | | - user motivation |
4 | | - interested in science |
5 | | - VC as a game: stats, etc |
6 | | - general altrusim |
7 | | - retention levels for various groups/motivations? |
8 | | - esp in context of multi-project services |
| 9 | * treat each user category separately? |
| 10 | * different services/types of services for each group |
| 11 | * science types: need forums, techie |
| 12 | * or: can they be combined synergistically? |
| 13 | * trickle down summaries of science |
| 14 | * tech support |
10 | | - treat each user category separately? |
11 | | - different services/types of services for each group |
12 | | - science types: need forums, techie |
13 | | - or: can they be combined synergistically? |
14 | | - trickle down summaries of science |
15 | | - tech support |
16 | | |
17 | | - stats: |
18 | | mark's market research |
19 | | - % of people who would take action in support of charity much larger than % of people who would take action in support of science? |
| 16 | * stats: mark's market research |
| 17 | * % of people who would take action in support of charity much larger than % of people who would take action in support of science? |
27 | | |
28 | | |
29 | | - it's not all free |
30 | | - volunteers are not working for free: they get paid in "results" -- scientific results, stats, social factors. |
31 | | - everything is financed: distribution of financing in volunteer computing |
32 | | - outreach: think of it as a grant application, submitted to tens of thousands of reviewers |
| 24 | * it's not all free |
| 25 | * volunteers are not working for free: they get paid in "results" -- scientific results, stats, social factors. |
| 26 | * everything is financed: distribution of financing in volunteer computing |
| 27 | * outreach: think of it as a grant application, submitted to tens of thousands of reviewers |
47 | | altrusim |
48 | | - get grant to do good popsci writing about projects |
49 | | - proper PR |
50 | | when getting a grant, should be required to get funding to allocate resources to writing, PR |
51 | | this should be a requirement of funding agencies |
52 | | - poss. adt'l involvement, depending on details |
53 | | - social status (badges) rather than credits (ie, different incentive system) |
| 41 | * altrusim |
| 42 | * get grant to do good popsci writing about projects |
| 43 | * proper PR |
| 44 | * when getting a grant, should be required to get funding to allocate resources to writing PR |
| 45 | * this should be a requirement of funding agencies |
| 46 | * poss. adt'l involvement, depending on details |
| 47 | * social status (badges) rather than credits (ie, different incentive system) |
55 | | stats/gaming crowd |
56 | | - self organized: teams, etc. |
57 | | - push info into those groups (news, etc) |
58 | | - just feed them credits |
59 | | |
60 | | …a good model: communities of shared interests |
61 | | - what are the causes sufficient to motivate action? |
62 | | - organize communities around these |
| 49 | * stats/gaming crowd |
| 50 | * self organized: teams, etc. |
| 51 | * push info into those groups (news, etc) |
| 52 | * just feed them credits |
| 53 | * good model: communities of shared interests |
| 54 | * what are the causes sufficient to motivate action? |
| 55 | * organize communities around these |
70 | | community of communicators |
71 | | -- social middleware -- every bionic project is a distributed thinking project designed to produce new users -- |
72 | | - writing |
73 | | - PR |
74 | | …just ask -- there are people to do this. |
75 | | …seek professionals in misc domains |
| 62 | community of communicators [[BR]] |
| 63 | -- social middleware -- every BOINC project is a distributed thinking project designed to produce new users -- |
| 64 | * writing, PR |
| 65 | * just ask -- there are people to do this. |
| 66 | * seek professionals in misc domains |